ALFANO DATA ANALYSIS Kartódromo Internacional do Algarve · 15 June 2026

Alfano data analysis: three changes for your next run

Find the speed you can repeat. Five measured laps point to one minimum-speed gain, one shorter lift and one gear experiment.

GaborKZ2Alfano 6 · 10 Hz

CORNER COACH

See where speed stays or falls away

Choose any corner to move the map and keep its next-run instruction on screen. On your phone, use the two compact arrows to work through the lap without leaving the map.

Your fastest lap60.560Lap 3
Best possible lap60.440Using Alfano partials
Top speed145.3km/h
Peak RPM14,734rpm
Laps compared5valid laps

COACHING PRIORITIES

What to change first

These are ranked by the change you can practise and transfer around the lap, not by corner number or the lowest speed.

01Minimum speed
CORNER 8 · Final sweeper

Carry more speed without losing the exit

High confidence

What the Alfano measured

Lap 5 was 0.119 s quicker through this final section than Lap 3. Apex speed was 91.7 km/h versus 87.0, and speed 40 m after the apex was 105.5 versus 102.8 km/h.

Why it matters

This is the clearest repeatable gain in the file. The faster minimum did not hurt the exit, so the Lap 5 approach is the reference to reproduce.

Next run

Use the Lap 5 turn in and minimum speed target. Build up in 1 km/h steps and keep the steering release clean onto the straight.

0.119measured seconds
02Lift duration
CORNER 3 · Fast left

Shorten the lift while holding the line

Medium confidence

What the Alfano measured

Lap 5 carried 107.1 km/h at the apex against 104.8 on Lap 3 and reached 114.9 km/h on exit against 110.5. The isolated section was 0.047 s quicker.

Why it matters

The kart accepted more minimum speed here. Because this is a fast corner, a small lift reduction compounds into the following acceleration zone.

Next run

Keep the same line first. Shorten the lift rather than moving the turn in and compare lateral acceleration shape before adding more speed.

0.047measured seconds
03Gear choice
CORNER 1 · First hairpin

Keep the engine in the stronger power band

Medium confidence

What the Alfano measured

Lap 3 fell to roughly 8,300 rpm in this corner. Lap 4 stayed near 9,600 rpm and carried about 4.9 km/h more at the mapped apex while the section time differed by only 0.020 s.

Why it matters

The fastest lap may be slowing too much or selecting the next gear too early. The data suggests an RPM/gear experiment, not proof that braking later is automatically faster.

Next run

Repeat the Lap 4 gear and release timing while preserving Lap 3 exit position. Review minimum RPM and the next 60 m together.

TESTcompare next run

LAP PROGRESSION

Fast by lap three. Then less repeatable.

Lap 3 is the session reference. Lap 4 confirms the pace within 0.420 s; Lap 5 contains the best final partial but loses time in partial one.

Lap 1
1:04.430+3.87
Lap 2
1:01.690+1.13
Lap 3
1:00.560BEST
Lap 4
1:00.980+0.42
Lap 5
1:02.660+2.10

OFFICIAL PARTIALS

Theoretical lap: 60.440

The available 0.120 s is not invented by a model. It is Lap 3 partials one and two plus Lap 5 partial three.

P114.810Lap 3
P226.890Lap 3
P318.740Lap 5 · 0.120 quicker

RAW DATA, MADE USEFUL

Read the lap, not just the lap time

The selected corner stays highlighted through every chart. Speed shows where momentum changes, RPM tests the gear choice, and gear position explains the power-band drops.

Speed51.5 to 145.3 km/h
Lap 3 · distance aligned
Engine speed8,465 to 14,419 rpm
Lap 3 · distance aligned
Gear1 to 6
Lap 3 · distance aligned
Mapped corner speedCompare the reference with the best measured lap
Tap a corner to sync the report
Lap 3 Best measured

ONE SESSION · THREE TESTS

What to test next session

  1. 01
    Reproduce Lap 5 at Corner 8

    Target 91 to 92 km/h at the mapped apex without giving away exit speed.

  2. 02
    Shorten the lift at Corner 3

    Hold the line constant. Change only lift duration so the comparison stays useful.

  3. 03
    Compare the gear choice at Corner 1

    Compare minimum RPM plus the following 60 metres, rather than minimum RPM in isolation.

DEEPER SESSION ANALYSIS

Find the time in every lap

Compare lap progression, input ranges and section deltas to see where pace changed and what you can repeat.

Lap progression

Every recorded lap

Reference lap 3
Lap 1
64.430 sTimed
Lap 2
61.690 sTimed
Lap 3
60.560 sReference
Lap 4
60.980 sTimed
Lap 5
62.660 sTimed
Channel ranges

Measured inputs and outputs

123 plotted samples
Speed123 samples
51.5 km/h89.0 km/h average145.3 km/h
Engine speed123 samples
8465 rpm11607 rpm average14419 rpm
Gear123 samples
14 average6
Section comparison

Where each lap gained or lost time

Compared with the session reference
SectionLap 1Lap 2Lap 4Lap 5
Partial 1+2.050 s+0.290 s+0.070 s+2.130 s
Partial 2+0.870 s+0.320 s+0.060 s+0.090 s
Partial 3+1.070 s+0.640 s+0.410 s+0.000 s